Team Assessment Behaviour (TAB): Is it an Ideal Tool for Improving Professional Behaviour in Trainee Doctors

Syed Adnan Kabir; Syed Irfan Kabir; Imran Khan; Roma Patel

doi:doi:10.11648/j.js.20140205.15

| Peer-Reviewed

Team Assessment Behaviour (TAB): Is it an Ideal Tool for Improving Professional Behaviour in Trainee Doctors

Syed Adnan Kabir, Syed Irfan Kabir, Imran Khan, Roma Patel

Published in Journal of Surgery (Volume 2, Issue 5)

Received: 25 September 2014 Accepted: 28 October 2014 Published: 30 October 2014

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The assessment of a trainee doctor’s performance in a clinical setup is not only challenging and important, but is also necessary to assure standards, judge competence to practice, set targets for improvements, and most importantly to protect patients. Multi source feedback (MSF) / Mini-Pat (Mini Peer Assessment Tool) / Team Assessment Behavior (TAB) are formative assessment tools that were developed to assess the professional behaviors and attitudes in health professionals, and to continually improve an individual’s team working skills. This article critically evaluates the use of Team Assessment Behavior (TAB) as an assessment tool for professional behavior in trainee doctors in the U.K, and concludes whether it is an ideal tool for improving professional behavior in trainee doctors.

Published in	Journal of Surgery (Volume 2, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.js.20140205.15
Page(s)	78-81
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Team Assessment Behaviour, Mini Peer Assessment Tools, Formative Assessment Tools, Work Based Assessments, Professional Behaviour in Trainee Doctors

References

[1]	Raven Department of education. Assessment of surgical trainees: Training the Trainers, Module 1: Learning and teaching (2006) page 44.
[2]	Southgate L, Cox T, David T, et al. The General Medical Council's performance procedures: peer review of performance in the workplace. Med Educ. 2001; 35 (Suppl 1): 9-19
[3]	Ramsden P. Learning to teach in higher education. 1992. London Routledge Press.
[4]	Ramsey PG, Carline JD, Blank LL, Wenrich MD. Feasibility of hospital based use of peer ratings to evaluate the performances of practicing physicians. Academic Medicine 1996; 71 :364-70.
[5]	Milind Pant, Prabhu N Nesargikar , Daniel M Cocker. Team Assessment Behaviour as an assessment tool: A Critical Evaluation: BJMP 2009: 2 (3) 35-37.
[6]	Woolliscroft J, Howell J, Patel BP, Swanson DB, Resident-patient interactions: The humanistic qualities of internal medicine residents assessed by patients, attending physicians, program supervisors and nurses. Academic Medicine 1994; 69: 216-224.
[7]	Southgate L, Grant J. Principles of an assessment system for postgraduate medical training. London: PMETB, 2004. A working paper from the Postgraduate Medical Education Training Board.
[8]	The Foundation Programme Committee of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, in co-operation with Modernising Medical Careers in the Departments of Health. Curriculum for the Foundation Years in Postgraduate Education and Training. London: Department of Health, 2005.
[9]	Aza Abdulla. A critical analysis of mini peer assessment tool (mini-PAT): JR Soc Med. 2008 January; 101(1): 22–26.
[10]	Good Medical Practice: General Medical council London (2011).
[11]	Whitehouse A, Hassel A, Wood L, Wall D, Walzman, Campbell I. Development and reliability testing of TAB a form for 360 degree assessment of senior house officers’ professional behavior, as specified by the GMC. Medical Teacher 2005; 27:252-8.
[12]	Cohen L, Manion L (2000). Research Meathods in education: 2000: 5th Edition: Routledge Press.
[13]	Wood L, Wall D, Bullock A, Hassell A, Whitehouse A, Campbell I. “ Team Observation”: A six year study of the development and use of multi-source feedback (360 degree assessment) in obstetrics and gynaecology training in the U.K. Medical Teacher 2006; 28: 177-84.
[14]	Kuzmits FE, Adams AJ, Sussman L, Raho LE. 360-feedback in health care management: a field study. The Health Care Manager 2004; 23 :321-8.
[15]	Nicol DJ, Macfarlane-dick D. Formative assessment and self –regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in higher education 2006; 31 : 199-218.
[16]	Bret and Atwater. The journal of applied Psychology 2001; 86;930-42.
[17]	Adulla A. Acritical analysis of mini peer assessment tool (mini-PAT); J R Soc Med 2008; 101; 22-26.
[18]	Kaplin R.360 degree feedback PLUS : boosting the power of co-worker ratings for executives. Human Resource Management 1993; 32 : 299-314.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Syed Adnan Kabir, Syed Irfan Kabir, Imran Khan, Roma Patel. (2014). Team Assessment Behaviour (TAB): Is it an Ideal Tool for Improving Professional Behaviour in Trainee Doctors. Journal of Surgery, 2(5), 78-81. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20140205.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Syed Adnan Kabir; Syed Irfan Kabir; Imran Khan; Roma Patel. Team Assessment Behaviour (TAB): Is it an Ideal Tool for Improving Professional Behaviour in Trainee Doctors. J. Surg. 2014, 2(5), 78-81. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20140205.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Syed Adnan Kabir, Syed Irfan Kabir, Imran Khan, Roma Patel. Team Assessment Behaviour (TAB): Is it an Ideal Tool for Improving Professional Behaviour in Trainee Doctors. J Surg. 2014;2(5):78-81. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20140205.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.js.20140205.15,
  author = {Syed Adnan Kabir and Syed Irfan Kabir and Imran Khan and Roma Patel},
  title = {Team Assessment Behaviour (TAB): Is it an Ideal Tool for Improving Professional Behaviour in Trainee Doctors},
  journal = {Journal of Surgery},
  volume = {2},
  number = {5},
  pages = {78-81},
  doi = {10.11648/j.js.20140205.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20140205.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.js.20140205.15},
  abstract = {The assessment of a trainee doctor’s performance in a clinical setup is not only challenging and important, but is also necessary to assure standards, judge competence to practice, set targets for improvements, and most importantly to protect patients. Multi source feedback (MSF) / Mini-Pat (Mini Peer Assessment Tool) / Team Assessment Behavior (TAB) are formative assessment tools that were developed to assess the professional behaviors and attitudes in health professionals, and to continually improve an individual’s team working skills. This article critically evaluates the use of Team Assessment Behavior (TAB) as an assessment tool for professional behavior in trainee doctors in the U.K, and concludes whether it is an ideal tool for improving professional behavior in trainee doctors.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Team Assessment Behaviour (TAB): Is it an Ideal Tool for Improving Professional Behaviour in Trainee Doctors
AU  - Syed Adnan Kabir
AU  - Syed Irfan Kabir
AU  - Imran Khan
AU  - Roma Patel
Y1  - 2014/10/30
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20140205.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.js.20140205.15
T2  - Journal of Surgery
JF  - Journal of Surgery
JO  - Journal of Surgery
SP  - 78
EP  - 81
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0930
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20140205.15
AB  - The assessment of a trainee doctor’s performance in a clinical setup is not only challenging and important, but is also necessary to assure standards, judge competence to practice, set targets for improvements, and most importantly to protect patients. Multi source feedback (MSF) / Mini-Pat (Mini Peer Assessment Tool) / Team Assessment Behavior (TAB) are formative assessment tools that were developed to assess the professional behaviors and attitudes in health professionals, and to continually improve an individual’s team working skills. This article critically evaluates the use of Team Assessment Behavior (TAB) as an assessment tool for professional behavior in trainee doctors in the U.K, and concludes whether it is an ideal tool for improving professional behavior in trainee doctors.
VL  - 2
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Syed Adnan Kabir

Surgical Department, Victoria Teaching Hospital, Glasgow, G42 9TY
Syed Irfan Kabir

Heatherwood and Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, Berkshire, SL22AL
Imran Khan

Department of Otolaryngology, Victoria Teaching Hospital, Glasgow, G42 9TY
Roma Patel

Department of Surgery, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, U.K, LN25 QY

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Syed Adnan Kabir, Syed Irfan Kabir, Imran Khan, Roma Patel. (2014). Team Assessment Behaviour (TAB): Is it an Ideal Tool for Improving Professional Behaviour in Trainee Doctors. Journal of Surgery, 2(5), 78-81. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20140205.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Syed Adnan Kabir; Syed Irfan Kabir; Imran Khan; Roma Patel. Team Assessment Behaviour (TAB): Is it an Ideal Tool for Improving Professional Behaviour in Trainee Doctors. J. Surg. 2014, 2(5), 78-81. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20140205.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Syed Adnan Kabir, Syed Irfan Kabir, Imran Khan, Roma Patel. Team Assessment Behaviour (TAB): Is it an Ideal Tool for Improving Professional Behaviour in Trainee Doctors. J Surg. 2014;2(5):78-81. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20140205.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.js.20140205.15,
  author = {Syed Adnan Kabir and Syed Irfan Kabir and Imran Khan and Roma Patel},
  title = {Team Assessment Behaviour (TAB): Is it an Ideal Tool for Improving Professional Behaviour in Trainee Doctors},
  journal = {Journal of Surgery},
  volume = {2},
  number = {5},
  pages = {78-81},
  doi = {10.11648/j.js.20140205.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20140205.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.js.20140205.15},
  abstract = {The assessment of a trainee doctor’s performance in a clinical setup is not only challenging and important, but is also necessary to assure standards, judge competence to practice, set targets for improvements, and most importantly to protect patients. Multi source feedback (MSF) / Mini-Pat (Mini Peer Assessment Tool) / Team Assessment Behavior (TAB) are formative assessment tools that were developed to assess the professional behaviors and attitudes in health professionals, and to continually improve an individual’s team working skills. This article critically evaluates the use of Team Assessment Behavior (TAB) as an assessment tool for professional behavior in trainee doctors in the U.K, and concludes whether it is an ideal tool for improving professional behavior in trainee doctors.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Team Assessment Behaviour (TAB): Is it an Ideal Tool for Improving Professional Behaviour in Trainee Doctors
AU  - Syed Adnan Kabir
AU  - Syed Irfan Kabir
AU  - Imran Khan
AU  - Roma Patel
Y1  - 2014/10/30
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20140205.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.js.20140205.15
T2  - Journal of Surgery
JF  - Journal of Surgery
JO  - Journal of Surgery
SP  - 78
EP  - 81
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0930
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20140205.15
AB  - The assessment of a trainee doctor’s performance in a clinical setup is not only challenging and important, but is also necessary to assure standards, judge competence to practice, set targets for improvements, and most importantly to protect patients. Multi source feedback (MSF) / Mini-Pat (Mini Peer Assessment Tool) / Team Assessment Behavior (TAB) are formative assessment tools that were developed to assess the professional behaviors and attitudes in health professionals, and to continually improve an individual’s team working skills. This article critically evaluates the use of Team Assessment Behavior (TAB) as an assessment tool for professional behavior in trainee doctors in the U.K, and concludes whether it is an ideal tool for improving professional behavior in trainee doctors.
VL  - 2
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download