Progress to the correlation of particle deposition velocity in turbulent pipe flow is presented. The developed model accounts for the Brownian diffusivity and inertia effects and is extended to cover the influence of the flow velocity by including Reynolds number in the correlation. The experimental data and previous proposed models are used in comparison of predicting particle deposition rate. It is shown that the new model of deposition velocity is in good agreement with the experimental data and numerical simulations. Further the aerodynamics has significant influence on the deposition rate and should be concerned when the process of particle migration and deposition is addressed. The deposition efficiency, the measurement tool of particle deposition rate in this work, increases with the increase of diameter for large particles, and with the decrease of diameter for submicron particles. Other factors addressed in this work are effects of particle to fluid density ratio, pipe diameter and the surface roughness. The results showed that increase in density ratio makes the deposition rate of submicron particles to increase too whereas no significant effects is noticed for large particles. Carrier pipe size is studied and the deposition rate curve shifts right with decreasing in pipe size. Finally, the deposition rate of particles is found to increase with increase in surface roughness.
Published in |
International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy (Volume 3, Issue 6-1)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Renewable Energy and Its Environmental Impaction |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijrse.s.2014030601.12 |
Page(s) | 7-14 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Particle Deposition, Turbulent Flow, Brownian-Inertia Motion, Surface Roughness
[1] | Browne, L. W. B. (1973). Deposition of particles on rough surfaces during turbulent gas-flow in a pipe. Atmospheric Environment, 8, 801-816. |
[2] | Chen, Q. and Ahmadi, G. (1997). Deposition of particles in a turbulent pipe flow. Journal of Aerosol Science, 28, 789-796. |
[3] | Cleaver, J. W. and Yates, B. (1975). A sublayer model for the deposition of particles from a turbulent flow. Chem.Engng Sci. 30, 983-992. |
[4] | Crowe, C.T. (2006). Multiphase Flow Handbook. Taylor & Francis Group, FL. |
[5] | Davies, C. N. (1966). Aerosol Science. Academic Press, London. |
[6] | Fan, F-G. and Ahmadi, G. (1993). A sublayer model for turbulent deposition of particles in vertical ducts with smooth and rough surfaces. Journal of Aerosol Science, 24, 45-64. |
[7] | Fan, F.-G. and Ahmadi, G. (1994). On the sublayer model for turbulent deposition of aerosol particles in the presence of gravity and electric fields. Aerosol Science Technology, 21, 49-71. |
[8] | Fichman, M., Gutfinger, C. and Pnueli, D. (1988). A model for turbulent deposition of aerosols. Journal of Aerosol Science, 19, 123-136. |
[9] | Friedlander, S. K. and Johnstone, H. H. (1957). Deposition of suspended particles from turbulent gas stream. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 49, 1151-1156. |
[10] | Fuchs, N. A. (1964). The Mechanics of Aerosol. Pergamon, Oxford. |
[11] | Hidy, G. M. (1984). Aerosols, an Industrial and Environmental Science. Academic Press, New York. |
[12] | Hinds, W.C., (1999). Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behaviour, and Measurement of Airborne Particles. 2nd Edition, Wiley, New York. |
[13] | Ilori, T. A. (1971). Turbulent deposition of aerosol particles inside pipes. PhD. thesis, University of Minnesota. |
[14] | Kvasnak, W., Ahmadi, G., Bayer, R., & Gaynes, M. (1993). Experimental investigation of dust particle deposition in a turbulent channel flow. Journal of Aerosol Science, 25, 795-815. |
[15] | Li, A. and Ahmadi, G. (1991). Dispersion and deposition of spherical particles from point sources in a turbulent channel flow. Journal of Aerosol Science Technology, 16, 209-226. |
[16] | Li, A. and Ahmadi, G. (1993). Deposition of aerosols on surfaces in a turbulent channel flow. International Journal of Engineering Science, 31, 435 451. |
[17] | Li, A., Ahmadi, G., Bayer, R. G. and Gaynes, M. A. (1994). Aerosol particle deposition in an obstructed turbulent duct flow. Journal of Aerosol Science, 25, 91-112. |
[18] | Liu, B. Y. H. and Agarwal, J. K. (1974). Experimental observation of aerosol deposition in turbulent flows. Journal of Aerosol Science, 5, 145-155. |
[19] | Maxwell J. C., (1868). On the dynamical theory of gases. Philos. Mag., vol. II, 26–78. |
[20] | Miguel, A. F., A. F., Reis, A., & Aydin, M. (2004). Aerosol particle deposition and distribution in bifurcating ventilation ducts. Journal of Hazardous Materials, B116, 249-255. |
[21] | Papavergos, P. G. and Hedley, A. B. (1984). Particle deposition behavior from turbulent flow. Cheical Engineering Research and Design, 62, 275-295. |
[22] | Schwendiman, L. C. and Postma, A. K. (1961). Hanford Laboratory Report HW-SA-2236, Richland, Washington, U.S.A., also (1962) Tech. Inf. Div. Report TID-7628, Book 1 (USAEC) 1. |
[23] | Sehmel, G. A. (1968). Aerosol deposition from turbulent airstreams in vertical conduits, Batelle Northwest Laboratory Report BNWL-578, Richland, Washington, U.S.A. |
[24] | Shams, M., Ahmadi, G., & Rahimzadah, H. (2000). A sublayer model for deposition of nano- and micro-particles in turbulent flows. Chemical Engineering Science, 55, 6097-6107. |
[25] | Sosnowski, T. R., Moskal, A., & Gradon, L. (2007). Mechanism of aerosol particle deposition in the Oro-Pharynx under non-steady airflow. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 51, 19-25. |
[26] | Tian, L. and Ahmadi, G. (2007). Particle deposition in turbulent duct flow-comparisons of different model predictions. Journal of Aerosol Science, 38, 377-397. |
[27] | Wells, A.C. and Chamberlain, A.C. (1967). Transport of Small Particles to Vertical Surfaces. British Journal of Applied Physics, 18, 1793. |
[28] | Wells, A. C. and Chamberlain, A. C. (1969). Deposition of dust from turbulent gas streams. Atmospheric Environment, 3, 494-496. |
[29] | Wood, N. B. (1981). A simple method for the calculation of turbulent deposition to smooth and rough surfaces. Journal of Aerosol Science, 12, 275-290. |
APA Style
Esam I. Jassim. (2015). Generalized Deposition Model of Tiny Solid Particle Immersed in Turbulent Flow. International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy, 3(6-1), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijrse.s.2014030601.12
ACS Style
Esam I. Jassim. Generalized Deposition Model of Tiny Solid Particle Immersed in Turbulent Flow. Int. J. Sustain. Green Energy 2015, 3(6-1), 7-14. doi: 10.11648/j.ijrse.s.2014030601.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijrse.s.2014030601.12, author = {Esam I. Jassim}, title = {Generalized Deposition Model of Tiny Solid Particle Immersed in Turbulent Flow}, journal = {International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy}, volume = {3}, number = {6-1}, pages = {7-14}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijrse.s.2014030601.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijrse.s.2014030601.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijrse.s.2014030601.12}, abstract = {Progress to the correlation of particle deposition velocity in turbulent pipe flow is presented. The developed model accounts for the Brownian diffusivity and inertia effects and is extended to cover the influence of the flow velocity by including Reynolds number in the correlation. The experimental data and previous proposed models are used in comparison of predicting particle deposition rate. It is shown that the new model of deposition velocity is in good agreement with the experimental data and numerical simulations. Further the aerodynamics has significant influence on the deposition rate and should be concerned when the process of particle migration and deposition is addressed. The deposition efficiency, the measurement tool of particle deposition rate in this work, increases with the increase of diameter for large particles, and with the decrease of diameter for submicron particles. Other factors addressed in this work are effects of particle to fluid density ratio, pipe diameter and the surface roughness. The results showed that increase in density ratio makes the deposition rate of submicron particles to increase too whereas no significant effects is noticed for large particles. Carrier pipe size is studied and the deposition rate curve shifts right with decreasing in pipe size. Finally, the deposition rate of particles is found to increase with increase in surface roughness.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Generalized Deposition Model of Tiny Solid Particle Immersed in Turbulent Flow AU - Esam I. Jassim Y1 - 2015/02/13 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijrse.s.2014030601.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijrse.s.2014030601.12 T2 - International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy JF - International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy JO - International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy SP - 7 EP - 14 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1549 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijrse.s.2014030601.12 AB - Progress to the correlation of particle deposition velocity in turbulent pipe flow is presented. The developed model accounts for the Brownian diffusivity and inertia effects and is extended to cover the influence of the flow velocity by including Reynolds number in the correlation. The experimental data and previous proposed models are used in comparison of predicting particle deposition rate. It is shown that the new model of deposition velocity is in good agreement with the experimental data and numerical simulations. Further the aerodynamics has significant influence on the deposition rate and should be concerned when the process of particle migration and deposition is addressed. The deposition efficiency, the measurement tool of particle deposition rate in this work, increases with the increase of diameter for large particles, and with the decrease of diameter for submicron particles. Other factors addressed in this work are effects of particle to fluid density ratio, pipe diameter and the surface roughness. The results showed that increase in density ratio makes the deposition rate of submicron particles to increase too whereas no significant effects is noticed for large particles. Carrier pipe size is studied and the deposition rate curve shifts right with decreasing in pipe size. Finally, the deposition rate of particles is found to increase with increase in surface roughness. VL - 3 IS - 6-1 ER -