Theory of multiple Intelligences introduced by Howard Gardner (1983) is one of the most significant recent reforms in education which has been embraced enthusiastically by educationalists, curriculum developers, lesson planners, teachers and textbook designers. The main purpose of this study is to investigate domestically designed and published ELT textbooks in the light of multiple intelligences theory. Three textbooks (grade 1,2 &3) utilized in senior high school of Iranian educational system were analyzed using multiple intelligence checklist developed by B.M, de Rozario (2003). The secondary aim of this study is to probe students’ preferred intelligences regarding diverse sorts of intelligences provided in the textbooks. To this end, 314 senior high school students participated in the study. The results of the study showed that verbal/linguistic and visual/spatial were the most predominant intelligences followed by logical/mathematical, interpersonal and intrapersonal in much lower ratios. Bodily/ kinesthetic, musical and naturalistic intelligences were not found in any percent. Students’ intelligence profiles were far from textbooks representations including all kinds of intelligences in varying degrees. Pedagogical implication and suggestion are presented in the end.
Published in |
International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 2, Issue 5-1)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Teaching English as a Foreign/Second Language |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.14 |
Page(s) | 24-31 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Multiple Intelligence, Textbooks, Senior High School, Intelligence Profile
[1] | Akbari, R and Hosseini, K. (2008), Multiple intelligences and language learning strategies: Investigating possible relations. System 36,141-155 |
[2] | Anning, A. (1991). The first year at school. Ballmoor: Open University Press. |
[3] | Azizfar, A, Koosha, M & Lotfi, A.R. (2010). An analytical evaluation of Iranian high school ELT textbooks from1970 to the present. Procedia social and behavioral sciences3. 36-44 |
[4] | Berman, M. (1998). A multiple intelligences road to an ELT classroom. Bencyfelin: Crown House. |
[5] | Ansary, H., & Babaii, E. (2002). Universal characteristics of EFL/ESL textbook: A step towards systematic Textbook evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal, 2, 1-8. |
[6] | Bas, G. (2008). Integrating multiple intelligences in ESL/EFL classrooms. The Internet TESL Journal, 14(5), May. |
[7] | Bas, G. (2010b). Ingilizce dersinde coklu zeka kuraminin ogrencilerin akademik basarilarina ve derse karsi tutumlarina katkilari. e-Journal of New World Science Academy. 5(2), 411-430. |
[8] | Birjandi, P. & Soheili, A. (1985). Right path to English. Tehran: Sherkat Chap va Nashr Iran. |
[9] | Berman, M. (1998). A multiple intelligences road to an ELT classroom. Bencyfelin: Crown House. |
[10] | Botelho, M. (2003) Multiple intelligence theory in English language teaching: An analysis of current textbooks, materials and teacher’s perceptions. College of arts and sciences of Ohio University |
[11] | Bowell, R. A. (2004). The seven steps of spiritual intelligence: The practical pursuit of purpose, success, and happiness. London, UK: Boston Nicholas Brealey Publishing |
[12] | Brown, J.B (1998).Textbook evaluation form. TLT online editor http://langue.hyper.chbu.ac.jp.jalt/pub/tlt/97/oct/brown/html |
[13] | Brewster, J., Ellis, G. & Girard, D. (2003). The primary English teacher’s guide. (New Ed.). London: Penguin Books. |
[14] | Oliviera, L. C. (2009), Course books and multiple Intelligences theory: an analysis |
[15] | Chen, P. S. (2007). The multiple intelligences and common leadership. Taipei, Taiwan: Sanmin |
[16] | Christison, M.A. (1996). Teaching and learning through multiple intelligences. TESOL journal, 6(1), 10-14 |
[17] | Christison, M.A. (1999). Multiple intelligences inventory for EFL teachers |
[18] | Christison, M.A & Kennedy, D (1999).Multiple intelligences: theory and practice in adult ESL. http://www.cal.org.ncle/digests/MI.htm |
[19] | Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books |
[20] | Gardner, H. (1993) "Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice." New York: Basic Books |
[21] | Gardner, H. (1999) "Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century." New York: Basic Books |
[22] | Garinger, D. (2001). ‘Textbook Evaluation’. TEFL web journal. Retrieved on November 2009.http://www.teflwebj.org/garinger html |
[23] | Green, F (1999). Brain and learning research: implications for meeting the needs of diverse learners. Education, 119 (4), 682-687 |
[24] | Greenhawk, L (1997). Multiple intelligences meets standards. Educational leadership, 55(1), 62-64 |
[25] | Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles of language teaching. (Second Ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
[26] | Loredana-A.S & Aneliz I.C(2011). A multiple intelligences approach: intuitive English learning – a case study for k-1 students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 11, 72-76 |
[27] | Kırkgöz, Y (2010). Catering for multiple intelligences in locally-published ELT textbooks in Turkey. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences3, 127-130 |
[28] | Mindy, K. (2005). Living usage ingeniously on the multiple intelligences. Taipei, Taiwan: Yuan-Liou. |
[29] | Osmon, D. C., & Jackson, R. (2002). Inspection time and IQ: Fluid or perceptual aspects of intelligence? Intelligence, 30(2), 119-127. |
[30] | Plamberg, R (2001) catering for multiple intelligences in course books. HLT Magazine, January 2002. Retrieved on November 9, 2002. http///www.hltmag.co.uk/Jan02/sart6htm |
[31] | Richards, J. C. (2001). ‘The role of textbooks in a language program’. Retrieved November 12, 2, 2008, from http://www.professorjackrichards.com/pdfs/role-of-textbooks.pdf. |
[32] | Richard, J. & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Second edition. Cambridge: CUP |
[33] | Sheldon, L. (1988). Evaluating ELT Textbooks and Materials. ELT Journal, 42(2). |
[34] | Sinder, D.P. (2001). ‘Multiple intelligences theory and foreign language teaching’. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, university of Utah |
[35] | Stefanski, E.H. (2002). Multiple intelligences and portfolios: a window into the learner’s mind. Portmouth: Heinemann |
[36] | Strahan, D. (1996). Teaching to diversity through multiple intelligences: student and teacher response to Instructional improvement. Middle level education, Quarterly, 19 (2), 43-65 |
[37] | Yarmohammadi, L. (2002). The evaluation of pre-university textbooks. The Newsletter of the Iranian Academy of Science, 18, 70-87. |
[38] | Taase, Y. (2012). Multiple intelligences theory and Iranian textbooks. Journal of Pan Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics. 16 (1). 73-82 |
APA Style
Yoones Taaseh, Ahmadreza Mohebbi, Farzane Mirzaei. (2014). Intelligence Profile of Iranian Domestically Designed and Published ELT Textbooks and Students’ Multiple Intelligences. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(5-1), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.14
ACS Style
Yoones Taaseh; Ahmadreza Mohebbi; Farzane Mirzaei. Intelligence Profile of Iranian Domestically Designed and Published ELT Textbooks and Students’ Multiple Intelligences. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2014, 2(5-1), 24-31. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.14
@article{10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.14, author = {Yoones Taaseh and Ahmadreza Mohebbi and Farzane Mirzaei}, title = {Intelligence Profile of Iranian Domestically Designed and Published ELT Textbooks and Students’ Multiple Intelligences}, journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics}, volume = {2}, number = {5-1}, pages = {24-31}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.s.2014020501.14}, abstract = {Theory of multiple Intelligences introduced by Howard Gardner (1983) is one of the most significant recent reforms in education which has been embraced enthusiastically by educationalists, curriculum developers, lesson planners, teachers and textbook designers. The main purpose of this study is to investigate domestically designed and published ELT textbooks in the light of multiple intelligences theory. Three textbooks (grade 1,2 &3) utilized in senior high school of Iranian educational system were analyzed using multiple intelligence checklist developed by B.M, de Rozario (2003). The secondary aim of this study is to probe students’ preferred intelligences regarding diverse sorts of intelligences provided in the textbooks. To this end, 314 senior high school students participated in the study. The results of the study showed that verbal/linguistic and visual/spatial were the most predominant intelligences followed by logical/mathematical, interpersonal and intrapersonal in much lower ratios. Bodily/ kinesthetic, musical and naturalistic intelligences were not found in any percent. Students’ intelligence profiles were far from textbooks representations including all kinds of intelligences in varying degrees. Pedagogical implication and suggestion are presented in the end.}, year = {2014} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Intelligence Profile of Iranian Domestically Designed and Published ELT Textbooks and Students’ Multiple Intelligences AU - Yoones Taaseh AU - Ahmadreza Mohebbi AU - Farzane Mirzaei Y1 - 2014/09/05 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.14 T2 - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JF - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JO - International Journal of Language and Linguistics SP - 24 EP - 31 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0221 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.14 AB - Theory of multiple Intelligences introduced by Howard Gardner (1983) is one of the most significant recent reforms in education which has been embraced enthusiastically by educationalists, curriculum developers, lesson planners, teachers and textbook designers. The main purpose of this study is to investigate domestically designed and published ELT textbooks in the light of multiple intelligences theory. Three textbooks (grade 1,2 &3) utilized in senior high school of Iranian educational system were analyzed using multiple intelligence checklist developed by B.M, de Rozario (2003). The secondary aim of this study is to probe students’ preferred intelligences regarding diverse sorts of intelligences provided in the textbooks. To this end, 314 senior high school students participated in the study. The results of the study showed that verbal/linguistic and visual/spatial were the most predominant intelligences followed by logical/mathematical, interpersonal and intrapersonal in much lower ratios. Bodily/ kinesthetic, musical and naturalistic intelligences were not found in any percent. Students’ intelligence profiles were far from textbooks representations including all kinds of intelligences in varying degrees. Pedagogical implication and suggestion are presented in the end. VL - 2 IS - 5-1 ER -