The difficulty for a sealing element to create and maintain a leak-free joint is determined by its sealing difficulty factor m1, m1 = elastic modulus Ec of its sealing contact layer/elastic modulus Es of its sealing contact layer substrate. Therefore, theoretically the contact layer of a sealing element shall be soft & inelastic and assembled up to its fully yielded deformation to provide a contact layer with a lower value of active elastic modulus Ec, and the contact layer substrate shall be strong & elastic and assembled up to its fully elastic deformation to provide a contact layer substrate with a higher value of active elastic modulus Es. It is the most difficult for a rubber sealing element to create a leak-free joint because its Ec ≡Es, and it is far easier for a metal sealing element than for a rubber sealing element because the metal sealing element can be designed and coated to ensure that assembling can cause its Ec < Es.
Published in |
International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering (Volume 5, Issue 4-1)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Xu’s Sealing and Flowing Theories of Fluids |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijepe.s.2016050401.16 |
Page(s) | 43-58 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Seal, Categorization of seals, Circle-based system of O-ring seals, Minimum necessary sealing stress y, Sealing difficulty factor m1, Leak-free maintenance factor m2, Self-sealing mechanism for material (Mechanism of self-sealing Poisson's deformation caused by fluid pressure), Self-sealing mechanism for O-rings (Mechanism of self-sealing deformation caused by fluid seepage)
[1] | ISO 3601:2008 Fluid Power Systems - O-Rings - Part 2: Housing Dimensions for General Applications |
[2] | XU Changxiang. XU's Designs and Parameters for Sealing Elements [J]. Petro-Chemical Equipment, 2013, 42(3): 58-63. |
[3] | The Presidential Commission. The Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident [R]. USA Washington, 1986-06-06. (history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/genindex.htm) |
[4] | Parker Hannifin Corporation. Parker O-Ring Handbook ORD 5700 (Fig.3-8 O-Ring Leak Rate, 3-19) [Z]. Cleveland USA, 2007. (www.parker.com/literature/ORD%205700%20Parker_O-Ring_Handbook.pdf) |
[5] | He Manjun, Zhang Hongdong, Chen Weixiao etc. Polymer Physics (Version 3) [M]. Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 2006: 106~107. |
[6] | Jin Wang etc. Observing a True Liquid Behavior on Polymer Thin Film Surfaces. [R] Argonne National Laboratory Reports. Argonne USA, 1999. (www.aps.anl.gov/Science/Reports/1999/wangj4.pdf) |
[7] | Mechanics of Materials Laboratory. Chapter 8 Time Dependant Behavior: Creep, ME 354 [M]. USA: the University of Washington, 2007. (courses.washington.edu/me354a/chap8.pdf) |
[8] | R. S. Lakes. On Poisson's Ratio in Linearly Viscoelastic Solids [J]. J Elasticity, 2006, 85: 45–63. (silver.neep.wisc.edu/~lakes/VEPoisson.pdf) |
[9] | Polymer Science Learning Center. Rubber and Rubberiness, Level three, the Macrogalleria of Polymers and Polymer Science [Z]. USA: the University of Southern Mississippi, 2005. (www.pslc.ws/macrog/level3.htm) |
APA Style
Xu Changxiang. (2016). Xu's Sealing Theory and Rectangular & O-Shaped Ring Seals. International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 5(4-1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.s.2016050401.16
ACS Style
Xu Changxiang. Xu's Sealing Theory and Rectangular & O-Shaped Ring Seals. Int. J. Energy Power Eng. 2016, 5(4-1), 43-58. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepe.s.2016050401.16
AMA Style
Xu Changxiang. Xu's Sealing Theory and Rectangular & O-Shaped Ring Seals. Int J Energy Power Eng. 2016;5(4-1):43-58. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepe.s.2016050401.16
@article{10.11648/j.ijepe.s.2016050401.16, author = {Xu Changxiang}, title = {Xu's Sealing Theory and Rectangular & O-Shaped Ring Seals}, journal = {International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering}, volume = {5}, number = {4-1}, pages = {43-58}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijepe.s.2016050401.16}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.s.2016050401.16}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijepe.s.2016050401.16}, abstract = {The difficulty for a sealing element to create and maintain a leak-free joint is determined by its sealing difficulty factor m1, m1 = elastic modulus Ec of its sealing contact layer/elastic modulus Es of its sealing contact layer substrate. Therefore, theoretically the contact layer of a sealing element shall be soft & inelastic and assembled up to its fully yielded deformation to provide a contact layer with a lower value of active elastic modulus Ec, and the contact layer substrate shall be strong & elastic and assembled up to its fully elastic deformation to provide a contact layer substrate with a higher value of active elastic modulus Es. It is the most difficult for a rubber sealing element to create a leak-free joint because its Ec ≡Es, and it is far easier for a metal sealing element than for a rubber sealing element because the metal sealing element can be designed and coated to ensure that assembling can cause its Ec Es.}, year = {2016} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Xu's Sealing Theory and Rectangular & O-Shaped Ring Seals AU - Xu Changxiang Y1 - 2016/08/24 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.s.2016050401.16 DO - 10.11648/j.ijepe.s.2016050401.16 T2 - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering JF - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering JO - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering SP - 43 EP - 58 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-960X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.s.2016050401.16 AB - The difficulty for a sealing element to create and maintain a leak-free joint is determined by its sealing difficulty factor m1, m1 = elastic modulus Ec of its sealing contact layer/elastic modulus Es of its sealing contact layer substrate. Therefore, theoretically the contact layer of a sealing element shall be soft & inelastic and assembled up to its fully yielded deformation to provide a contact layer with a lower value of active elastic modulus Ec, and the contact layer substrate shall be strong & elastic and assembled up to its fully elastic deformation to provide a contact layer substrate with a higher value of active elastic modulus Es. It is the most difficult for a rubber sealing element to create a leak-free joint because its Ec ≡Es, and it is far easier for a metal sealing element than for a rubber sealing element because the metal sealing element can be designed and coated to ensure that assembling can cause its Ec Es. VL - 5 IS - 4-1 ER -