| Peer-Reviewed

Research on Pricing Strategy of Port Charge Based on Market Regulation

Received: 11 December 2015     Published: 11 December 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Under the liberalization of port competitive service charges of China, the paper focuses on the pricing strategy of port charge in order to transform the rates from government guidance or uniform charge into market regulation, comparing the port charge as well as its throughput under the scenarios between Bertrand-competition and price-matching, then conducting the illustration and sensitivity analysis with changing of the major parameter to gain further managerial insights.

Published in International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (Volume 3, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijebo.20150306.12
Page(s) 85-88
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Port Charge, Competitive Service, Pricing Strategy, Market Regulation

References
[1] W.Y. Yap, J.S.L. Lam, “Competition dynamics between container ports in East Asia,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2006, vol. 1, pp. 35-51.
[2] C. Comtois, J. Dong, “Port competition in the Yangtze River Delta,” Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 2007, vol. 3, pp. 299-311.
[3] M. Acosta, D. Coronado, M.M. Cerbana, “Port competitiveness in container traffic from an internal point of view: the experience of the Port of Algeciras Bay,” Maritime Policy & Management, 2007, vol. 5, pp. 501-520.
[4] G.T. Yeo, M. Roe, J. Dinwoodie, “Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2008, vol. 6, pp. 910-921.
[5] D.W. Song, “Port co-opetition in concept and practice,” Maritime Policy & Management, 2003, vol. 1, pp. 29-44.
[6] C.X. Wang, L.K. Jiang, “Cooperation and competition strategies among regional multiple ports and profit allocation mechanism,” Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 2009, vol. 2, pp. 1-7.
[7] J.B. Li, Y.S. Oh, “A Research on Competition and Cooperation between Shanghai Port and Ningbo-Zhoushan Port,” The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 2010, vol. 1, pp. 67-91.
[8] N. Saeed, O.I. Larsen, “An application of cooperative game among container terminals of one port,” European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, vol. 2, pp. 393-403.
[9] C.C. Hwang, C.H. Chiang, “Cooperation and competitiveness of intra-regional container ports,” Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 2010, vol. 8, pp.2254-2269.
[10] M. Ishiia, P.T.W. Lee, K. Tezuka, Y.T. Chang, “A game theoretical analysis of port competition,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2013, vol.1, pp. 92-106.
[11] H. Mclaughlin, C. Fearon, “Understanding the development of port and regional relationships: a new cooperation/competition matrix,” Maritime Policy & Management, 2013, vol.3, pp. 278-294.
[12] W.F. Zhuang, M.F. Luo, X.W. Fu, “A game theory analysis of port specialization-implications to the Chinese port industry,” Maritime Policy & Management, 2014, vol.3, pp. 268-287.
[13] R. Robinson, “Cooperation strategies in port-oriented bulk supply chains: aligning concept and practice,” International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 2015, vol.18, pp. 193-206.
[14] P.T.W. Lee, J.S.L. Lam, “Container port competition and competitiveness analysis: Asian major ports,” International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 2015, vol.220, pp. 97-136.
[15] D.W. Song, S.H. Cheon, C. Pire, “Does size matter for port coopetition strategy? Concept, motivation and implication,” International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 2015, vol.18, pp. 207-227.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Gang Dong. (2015). Research on Pricing Strategy of Port Charge Based on Market Regulation. International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(6), 85-88. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20150306.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Gang Dong. Research on Pricing Strategy of Port Charge Based on Market Regulation. Int. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2015, 3(6), 85-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20150306.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Gang Dong. Research on Pricing Strategy of Port Charge Based on Market Regulation. Int J Econ Behav Organ. 2015;3(6):85-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20150306.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijebo.20150306.12,
      author = {Gang Dong},
      title = {Research on Pricing Strategy of Port Charge Based on Market Regulation},
      journal = {International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization},
      volume = {3},
      number = {6},
      pages = {85-88},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijebo.20150306.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20150306.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijebo.20150306.12},
      abstract = {Under the liberalization of port competitive service charges of China, the paper focuses on the pricing strategy of port charge in order to transform the rates from government guidance or uniform charge into market regulation, comparing the port charge as well as its throughput under the scenarios between Bertrand-competition and price-matching, then conducting the illustration and sensitivity analysis with changing of the major parameter to gain further managerial insights.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Research on Pricing Strategy of Port Charge Based on Market Regulation
    AU  - Gang Dong
    Y1  - 2015/12/11
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20150306.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijebo.20150306.12
    T2  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
    JF  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
    JO  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
    SP  - 85
    EP  - 88
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7616
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20150306.12
    AB  - Under the liberalization of port competitive service charges of China, the paper focuses on the pricing strategy of port charge in order to transform the rates from government guidance or uniform charge into market regulation, comparing the port charge as well as its throughput under the scenarios between Bertrand-competition and price-matching, then conducting the illustration and sensitivity analysis with changing of the major parameter to gain further managerial insights.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China

  • Sections