We studied the structures and energies associated with 8 types of point defects on the [0001] surface of hexagonal gallium nitride (GaN) by modeling: (1) Ga vacancies (VGa), (2) N vacancies (VN), (3) substitution of N by Ga (GaN), (4) substitution of Ga by N (NGa), (5) Ga octahedral interstitial defects (GaO), (6) Ga tetrahedral interstitial defects (GaT), (7) N octahedral interstitial defects (NO), and (8) N tetrahedral interstitial defects (NT). Using a plane-wave ultrasoft pseudopotential method, we calculate these defect structures, simulate the shift, bonding, and relaxation reconstruction of surface atoms in response to the formation of these defects and also calculate the formation energies of these defects. We find that the Ga-related defects only slightly affect the surface, whereas all N-related defects induce substantial surface reconstruction. In particular, the formation of NT not only induces distortion of the surface structure, but also significantly influences the structure of the deeper lattice space. Calculations of formation energies suggest that, in Ga-rich conditions, GaO forms most easily, followed by GaN, VN, and GaT. In comparison, in N-rich conditions, VGa forms most easily. In all environments, GaO, GaN, and VGa form more easily than VN, and the formation of octahedral interstitial defects requires less energy than tetrahedral interstitial defects, which suggests it is difficult to form tetrahedral interstitial defects in the GaN (0001) surface.
Published in | American Journal of Physical Chemistry (Volume 3, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajpc.20140304.12 |
Page(s) | 47-53 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Point Defect, Gallium Nitride, Surface Reconstruction, Simulation
[1] | S.C.Binari, W.Kruppa, H.B.Dietrich, G.Kelner, A. E.Wickenden, J.A.Freitas, Solid- State Electron. 1 (1997) 1549. |
[2] | R.Gaska,Q.Chen, J.Yang, A.Osinsky, M. Asifkhan, M.S.Shur, IEEE Electron. Dev. Lett. 18 (1997) 492. |
[3] | G. J.Sullivan, M.Y.Chen, J. A.Higgins, J.W.Yang, Q.Chen, . P. L.Pierson, B. T.McDermott, IEEE Electron. Dev. Lett. 19 (1998.) 198. |
[4] | B.Heying, R.A.verbeck, L.F.Chen, E.Haus, H.Riechert, J.S.Speck, J. Appl. Phys. 88 (2000) 1855. |
[5] | L. X.Zheng, M.H.Xie, S.M.Seutter, S.H.Cheung, S.Y.Tong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 2352. |
[6] | C.Adelmann, J.Brault, G.Mula, B.Daudin, L.Lymperakis, J.Neugebauer, Phys. Rev. B. 67 (2003) 165419. |
[7] | G.Koblmüller, R.Averbeck, H. Riechert, P.Pongratz, Phys. Rev. B. 69 (2004) 035325. |
[8] | N. M. Harrison, Comput.Phys. Commun. 137 (2001) 59-73. |
[9] | Chun Yang, Yang Chong, P.Huang, X.Q.Liang, Surf. Rev. Lett. 6 (2011) 315-321. |
[10] | E.William, J.Packard, D.Dow, J. Mater. Res. 3 (1997) 646-650. |
[11] | D. C.Look, Z. P. Fang, L.Polenta, Mater. Res .Soc. 595 (1999) 603. |
[12] | K.Saarinen, T.Suski, I.Grzegory, D.C.Look, Phys. Rev. B. 64 (2001) 233201. |
[13] | K.H.Chow, G.D.Watkins, A. Usui, M.Mizuta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 2761-2764. |
[14] | K.Burke, J.P.Perdew, Y.Wang, Electronic Density Functional Theory, Recent Progress and New Directions,Plenum Press Inc., New York, 1998. |
[15] | J. P.Perdew, K.Burke, M.Ernzerhof, 1996. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865-3868. |
[16] | B.Hammer, L. B.Hansen, J.K.Norskov, Phys. Rev. B. 59 (1999) 7413-7421 |
[17] | T. H.Fischer, J.Almlof, J. Phys. Chem. 96 (1992) 9768-9774. |
[18] | R.W.G.Wyckoff, Crtstal Structures. Wiley Inc., New York, 1962. |
[19] | U.Grossner, J.Furthmüller, F.Bechsted, Phys. Rev. B. 59 (1999) 15166-15180 |
[20] | D.R.Lide, Handbook of Phusics and Chemistry. CRC Press, New York, 1995. |
APA Style
Chun Yang, Weiwei Jie, Ping Huang, Xiaoqing Liang, Xiaoxiao Pan. (2014). First-Principles Calculations of the Formation and Structures of Point Defects on GaN (0001) Surface. American Journal of Physical Chemistry, 3(4), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpc.20140304.12
ACS Style
Chun Yang; Weiwei Jie; Ping Huang; Xiaoqing Liang; Xiaoxiao Pan. First-Principles Calculations of the Formation and Structures of Point Defects on GaN (0001) Surface. Am. J. Phys. Chem. 2014, 3(4), 47-53. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpc.20140304.12
AMA Style
Chun Yang, Weiwei Jie, Ping Huang, Xiaoqing Liang, Xiaoxiao Pan. First-Principles Calculations of the Formation and Structures of Point Defects on GaN (0001) Surface. Am J Phys Chem. 2014;3(4):47-53. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpc.20140304.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajpc.20140304.12, author = {Chun Yang and Weiwei Jie and Ping Huang and Xiaoqing Liang and Xiaoxiao Pan}, title = {First-Principles Calculations of the Formation and Structures of Point Defects on GaN (0001) Surface}, journal = {American Journal of Physical Chemistry}, volume = {3}, number = {4}, pages = {47-53}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajpc.20140304.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpc.20140304.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpc.20140304.12}, abstract = {We studied the structures and energies associated with 8 types of point defects on the [0001] surface of hexagonal gallium nitride (GaN) by modeling: (1) Ga vacancies (VGa), (2) N vacancies (VN), (3) substitution of N by Ga (GaN), (4) substitution of Ga by N (NGa), (5) Ga octahedral interstitial defects (GaO), (6) Ga tetrahedral interstitial defects (GaT), (7) N octahedral interstitial defects (NO), and (8) N tetrahedral interstitial defects (NT). Using a plane-wave ultrasoft pseudopotential method, we calculate these defect structures, simulate the shift, bonding, and relaxation reconstruction of surface atoms in response to the formation of these defects and also calculate the formation energies of these defects. We find that the Ga-related defects only slightly affect the surface, whereas all N-related defects induce substantial surface reconstruction. In particular, the formation of NT not only induces distortion of the surface structure, but also significantly influences the structure of the deeper lattice space. Calculations of formation energies suggest that, in Ga-rich conditions, GaO forms most easily, followed by GaN, VN, and GaT. In comparison, in N-rich conditions, VGa forms most easily. In all environments, GaO, GaN, and VGa form more easily than VN, and the formation of octahedral interstitial defects requires less energy than tetrahedral interstitial defects, which suggests it is difficult to form tetrahedral interstitial defects in the GaN (0001) surface.}, year = {2014} }
TY - JOUR T1 - First-Principles Calculations of the Formation and Structures of Point Defects on GaN (0001) Surface AU - Chun Yang AU - Weiwei Jie AU - Ping Huang AU - Xiaoqing Liang AU - Xiaoxiao Pan Y1 - 2014/09/30 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpc.20140304.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajpc.20140304.12 T2 - American Journal of Physical Chemistry JF - American Journal of Physical Chemistry JO - American Journal of Physical Chemistry SP - 47 EP - 53 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2327-2449 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpc.20140304.12 AB - We studied the structures and energies associated with 8 types of point defects on the [0001] surface of hexagonal gallium nitride (GaN) by modeling: (1) Ga vacancies (VGa), (2) N vacancies (VN), (3) substitution of N by Ga (GaN), (4) substitution of Ga by N (NGa), (5) Ga octahedral interstitial defects (GaO), (6) Ga tetrahedral interstitial defects (GaT), (7) N octahedral interstitial defects (NO), and (8) N tetrahedral interstitial defects (NT). Using a plane-wave ultrasoft pseudopotential method, we calculate these defect structures, simulate the shift, bonding, and relaxation reconstruction of surface atoms in response to the formation of these defects and also calculate the formation energies of these defects. We find that the Ga-related defects only slightly affect the surface, whereas all N-related defects induce substantial surface reconstruction. In particular, the formation of NT not only induces distortion of the surface structure, but also significantly influences the structure of the deeper lattice space. Calculations of formation energies suggest that, in Ga-rich conditions, GaO forms most easily, followed by GaN, VN, and GaT. In comparison, in N-rich conditions, VGa forms most easily. In all environments, GaO, GaN, and VGa form more easily than VN, and the formation of octahedral interstitial defects requires less energy than tetrahedral interstitial defects, which suggests it is difficult to form tetrahedral interstitial defects in the GaN (0001) surface. VL - 3 IS - 4 ER -