Protose is the enzyme digest of mixed proteins that is recommended for culture media, bulk production of enzymes, antibiotics, toxins, veterinary preparations, etc. This study was proposed to evaluate the effect of biofield energy treatment on the physicochemical and spectroscopic properties of protose. The study was achieved in two groups i.e. control and treated. The control group was remained as untreated, while the treated group was received Mr. Trivedi’s biofield energy treatment. Finally, both the control and treated samples were evaluated using various analytical techniques. The X-ray diffractograms (XRD) of control and treated samples showed the halo patterns peak that suggested the amorphous nature of both the samples of protose. The particle size analysis showed about 12.68% and 90.94 increase in the average particle size (d50) and d99 (particle size below which 99% particles are present) of treated protose with respect to the control. The surface area analysis revealed the 4.96% decrease in the surface area of treated sample as compared to the control sample. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis revealed the 22.49% increase in the latent heat of fusion of treated sample as compared to the control. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) analysis showed increase in maximum thermal degradation temperature (Tmax) by 5.02% in treated sample as compared to the control. The increase in Tmax might be correlated with increased thermal stability of treated sample as compared to the control. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) study showed the alteration in the vibrational frequency of functional groups like N-H, C-H, and S=O of treated protose as compared to the control sample. Based on the overall analytical results, it is concluded that Mr. Trivedi’s biofield energy treatment has a significant impact on the physicochemical and spectral properties of protose. As a result, the treated protose might be more effective as a culture medium than the corresponding control.
| Published in | American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences (Volume 3, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajbls.20150306.11 |
| Page(s) | 104-110 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Biofield Energy Treatment, Protose, X-ray Diffraction, Particle Size Analysis, Surface Area Analysis, Differential Scanning Calorimetry, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
| [1] | Urry LA (2013) e-Study guide for campbell biology in focus. (1stedn), Cram 101 textbook reviews. eISBN 9781478445562. |
| [2] | Park B, Lu R (2015) Hyperspectral imaging technology in food and agriculture. Springer technology & engineering. Media LLC, New York. |
| [3] | http://2.imimg.com/data2/TS/YC/MY-1034079/animal-origin-peptones-protein-hydrolysates.pdf |
| [4] | Pasupuleti VK, Braun S (2010) Protein Hydrolysates in Biotechnology. State of the Art Manufacturing of Protein Hydrolysates. Springer Science & Business Media. New York. |
| [5] | http://www.neogen.com/Acumedia/pdf/MediaIngredients.pdf |
| [6] | http://himedialabs.com/TD/RM280.pdf |
| [7] | Lenssen AW (2013) Biofield and fungicide seed treatment influences on soybean productivity, seed quality and weed community. Agricultural Journal 8: 138-143. |
| [8] | Trivedi MK, Patil S, Tallapragada RM (2013) Effect of bio field treatment on the physical and thermal characteristics of silicon, tin and lead powders. J Material Sci Eng 2: 125. |
| [9] | Koithan M (2009) Introducing complementary and alternative therapies. J Nurse Pract 5: 18-20. |
| [10] | Rubik B (2008) Measurement of the human biofield and other energetic instruments, Chapter 20 of energetics and spirituality by Lyn Freeman. http://www.faim.org/energymedicine/measurement-human-biofield.html. |
| [11] | Ho MW (1995) Bioenergetics and the coherence of organisms. Neuronetwork World 5: 733-750. |
| [12] | Gough WC (1999) The cellular communication process and alternative modes of healing. Subtle Energies Energy Med 8: 67-101. |
| [13] | Warber SL, Cornelio D, Straughn J, Kile G (2004) Biofield energy healing from the inside. J Altern Complement Med 10: 1107-1113. |
| [14] | Chang PL (2015) What is the human biofield and the role of biophotons? http://energyfanatics.com/2015/01/02/what-is-human-biofield-role-biophotons. |
| [15] | Stenger VJ (1999) Bioenergetic fields. Sci Rev Alternative Med 3. http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/vstenger/Medicine/Biofield.html |
| [16] | Shinde V, Sances F, Patil S, Spence A (2012) Impact of biofield treatment on growth and yield of lettuce and tomato. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 6: 100-105. |
| [17] | Sances F, Flora E, Patil S, Spence A, Shinde V (2013) Impact of biofield treatment on ginseng and organic blueberry yield. Agrivita, J Agric Sci 35. |
| [18] | Nayak G, Altekar N (2015) Effect of biofield treatment on plant growth and adaptation. J Environ Health Sci 1: 1-9. |
| [19] | Trivedi MK, Nayak G, Patil S, Tallapragada RM, Jana S, et al. (2015) Bio-field treatment: An effective strategy to improve the quality of beef extract and meat infusion powder. J Nutr Food Sci 5: 389. |
| [20] | Pavia DL, Lampman GM, Kriz GS (2001) Introduction to spectroscopy. (3rdedn), Thomson Learning, Singapore. |
| [21] | Chauhan A, Chauhan P (2014) Powder XRD technique and its applications in science and technology. J Anal Bioanal Tech 5: 212. |
| [22] | Trivedi MK, Nayak G, Patil S, Tallapragada RM, Latiyal O (2015) Evaluation of biofield treatment on physical, atomic and structural characteristics of manganese (II, III) oxide. J Material Sci Eng 4: 177. |
| [23] | Groza JR, Shackelford JF (2007) Materials processing handbook. Taylor and Francis group, CRC Press. |
| [24] | Cairo JM (2013) Mosby's respiratory care equipment. (9thedn), Elsevier health sciences, St. Louis Missouri. |
| [25] | Spear RJ, Maksacheff M (1986) The relationship between ignition temperature and thermal stability for selected primary explosives. Thermochim Acta 105: 287-293. |
| [26] | Smith BC (1998) Infrared spectral interpretation: A systematic approach. CRC Press. |
| [27] | Chaban GM, Huo WM, Lee TJ (2002) Theoretical study of infrared and Raman spectra of hydrated magnesium sulfate salts. The J Chem Phys 117: 2532-2537. |
| [28] | http://www.instruction.greenriver.edu/kmarr/chem%20162/Chem162%20Labs/Interpreting%20IR%20Spectra/IR%20Absorptions%20for%20Functional%20Groups.htm |
| [29] | Lin-Vien D, Colthup NB, Fateley WG, Grasselli JG (1991) The handbook of infrared and Raman characteristic frequencies of organic molecules. Academic press, San Diego, New York. |
APA Style
Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Alice Branton, Dahryn Trivedi, Gopal Nayak, Khemraj Bairwa, et al. (2015). Physicochemical and Spectroscopic Properties of Biofield Energy Treated Protose. American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences, 3(6), 104-110. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbls.20150306.11
ACS Style
Mahendra Kumar Trivedi; Alice Branton; Dahryn Trivedi; Gopal Nayak; Khemraj Bairwa, et al. Physicochemical and Spectroscopic Properties of Biofield Energy Treated Protose. Am. J. Biomed. Life Sci. 2015, 3(6), 104-110. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbls.20150306.11
AMA Style
Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Alice Branton, Dahryn Trivedi, Gopal Nayak, Khemraj Bairwa, et al. Physicochemical and Spectroscopic Properties of Biofield Energy Treated Protose. Am J Biomed Life Sci. 2015;3(6):104-110. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbls.20150306.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajbls.20150306.11,
author = {Mahendra Kumar Trivedi and Alice Branton and Dahryn Trivedi and Gopal Nayak and Khemraj Bairwa and Snehasis Jana},
title = {Physicochemical and Spectroscopic Properties of Biofield Energy Treated Protose},
journal = {American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences},
volume = {3},
number = {6},
pages = {104-110},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajbls.20150306.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbls.20150306.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbls.20150306.11},
abstract = {Protose is the enzyme digest of mixed proteins that is recommended for culture media, bulk production of enzymes, antibiotics, toxins, veterinary preparations, etc. This study was proposed to evaluate the effect of biofield energy treatment on the physicochemical and spectroscopic properties of protose. The study was achieved in two groups i.e. control and treated. The control group was remained as untreated, while the treated group was received Mr. Trivedi’s biofield energy treatment. Finally, both the control and treated samples were evaluated using various analytical techniques. The X-ray diffractograms (XRD) of control and treated samples showed the halo patterns peak that suggested the amorphous nature of both the samples of protose. The particle size analysis showed about 12.68% and 90.94 increase in the average particle size (d50) and d99 (particle size below which 99% particles are present) of treated protose with respect to the control. The surface area analysis revealed the 4.96% decrease in the surface area of treated sample as compared to the control sample. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis revealed the 22.49% increase in the latent heat of fusion of treated sample as compared to the control. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) analysis showed increase in maximum thermal degradation temperature (Tmax) by 5.02% in treated sample as compared to the control. The increase in Tmax might be correlated with increased thermal stability of treated sample as compared to the control. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) study showed the alteration in the vibrational frequency of functional groups like N-H, C-H, and S=O of treated protose as compared to the control sample. Based on the overall analytical results, it is concluded that Mr. Trivedi’s biofield energy treatment has a significant impact on the physicochemical and spectral properties of protose. As a result, the treated protose might be more effective as a culture medium than the corresponding control.},
year = {2015}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Physicochemical and Spectroscopic Properties of Biofield Energy Treated Protose AU - Mahendra Kumar Trivedi AU - Alice Branton AU - Dahryn Trivedi AU - Gopal Nayak AU - Khemraj Bairwa AU - Snehasis Jana Y1 - 2015/11/14 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbls.20150306.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajbls.20150306.11 T2 - American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences JF - American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences JO - American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences SP - 104 EP - 110 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-880X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbls.20150306.11 AB - Protose is the enzyme digest of mixed proteins that is recommended for culture media, bulk production of enzymes, antibiotics, toxins, veterinary preparations, etc. This study was proposed to evaluate the effect of biofield energy treatment on the physicochemical and spectroscopic properties of protose. The study was achieved in two groups i.e. control and treated. The control group was remained as untreated, while the treated group was received Mr. Trivedi’s biofield energy treatment. Finally, both the control and treated samples were evaluated using various analytical techniques. The X-ray diffractograms (XRD) of control and treated samples showed the halo patterns peak that suggested the amorphous nature of both the samples of protose. The particle size analysis showed about 12.68% and 90.94 increase in the average particle size (d50) and d99 (particle size below which 99% particles are present) of treated protose with respect to the control. The surface area analysis revealed the 4.96% decrease in the surface area of treated sample as compared to the control sample. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis revealed the 22.49% increase in the latent heat of fusion of treated sample as compared to the control. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) analysis showed increase in maximum thermal degradation temperature (Tmax) by 5.02% in treated sample as compared to the control. The increase in Tmax might be correlated with increased thermal stability of treated sample as compared to the control. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) study showed the alteration in the vibrational frequency of functional groups like N-H, C-H, and S=O of treated protose as compared to the control sample. Based on the overall analytical results, it is concluded that Mr. Trivedi’s biofield energy treatment has a significant impact on the physicochemical and spectral properties of protose. As a result, the treated protose might be more effective as a culture medium than the corresponding control. VL - 3 IS - 6 ER -
Email: