The study examined the relationship between personality, coping strategies, and level of psychological stress. Participants consisted of 148 university students from a private university college in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Leonard Personality Inventory (LPI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and COPE Inventory were used. The results revealed that participants who have high analytical personality dimension were more likely to use problem-focused coping. Those with high relational and low openness personality dimension were more likely to use socially supported coping strategies. Contrary to expectation, level of psychological stress was not influenced by personality. However, higher level of psychological stress was related to avoidant and socially supported coping strategies. Findings may be beneficial to mental health professionals in helping university students to manage their stress.
Published in |
American Journal of Applied Psychology (Volume 4, Issue 3-1)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychology of University Students |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajap.s.2015040301.16 |
Page(s) | 33-38 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Personality, Coping Strategies, Psychological Stress, University Students
[1] | Bojuwoye, O. (2002). Stressful experiences of first year students of selected universities in South Africa. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 15(3), 270 – 290. |
[2] | Hystad, S. W., Eid, J., Laberg, J. C., Johnsen, B. H., & Bartone, P. T. (2009). Academic stress and health: Exploring the moderating role of personality hardiness. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 421-429. |
[3] | Hudd, S. S., Dumlao, J., Erdmann-Sager, D., Murray, D., Phan, E., Soukas, N., et al. (2000). Stress at college: Effects on health-habits, health status and self-esteem. College Student Journal, 34(2), 217-227. |
[4] | Robotham, D. & Julian, C. (2006). Stress and higher education student: A critical review of the literature. Journal of further and higher education, 30, 107 – 117. |
[5] | Pierceall, E.A., & Keim, M.C. (2007). Stress and coping strategies among community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 31(9), 703 – 712. |
[6] | Robotham, D. (2008). Stress among higher education students: Towards a research agenda. Higher Education, 56, 735 – 746. |
[7] | Mahmoud, J. S. R., Staten, R. T., Hall, L. A., & Lennie, T. A. (2012). The relationship among young adult college students’ depression, anxiety, stress, demographics, life satisfaction, and coping styles. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 33, 149 – 156. |
[8] | Murphy, M. C., & Archer, J. A. (1996). Stressors on the college campus: A comparison of 1985 and 1993. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 20-28. |
[9] | Alginahi, Y.M., Ahmed, M., Tayan, O., Siddiqi, A.A., Sharif, L., Alharby, A., & Nour, R. (2009). ICT students, stress and coping strategies: English perspective as a case study of midsize middle eastern university. Trends in Information Management, 5(2), 111 – 140. |
[10] | Daugherty, T. K., & Lane, R. J. (1999). A longitudinal study of academic and social predictors of college attrition. Social Behavior and Personality, 55, 299-316. |
[11] | Li, M.H. (2008). Relationships among stress coping, secure attachment and the trait of resilience among Taiwanese college students. College Student Journal, 42(2), 312 – 325. |
[12] | Karimzade, A., & Besharat, M. A. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between personality dimensions and stress coping styles. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 797 – 802. |
[13] | Vollrath, M., & Torgersen, S. (2000). Personality types and coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(2), 367 – 378. |
[14] | Wang, W., & Miao, D. (2009). The relationships among coping styles, personality traits and mental health of Chinese medical students. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(2), 163 – 172. |
[15] | Leandro, P. G., & Castillo, M. D. (2010). Coping with stress and its relationship with personality dimensions, anxiety, and depression. Journal of Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1562 – 1573. |
[16] | Yong, M. S. (2012). Emotional excellence in the workplace: Leonard Personality Inventory (LPI) personality profiling. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Leonard Personality Incoporated. |
[17] | Vollrath, M. E. (2006). Handbook of personality and health. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons. |
[18] | Dumitru, V. M., & Cozman, D. (2012). The relationship between stress and personality factors. International Journal of the Bioflux Society, 4, 34-39. |
[19] | Kaur, R., Chodagiri, V. K., & Reddi, N. K. (2013). A psychological study of stress, personality and coping in police personnel. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 35, 141-147. |
[20] | Fokman, S.. & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 48, 150 – 170. |
[21] | Carver, C.S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267 – 283. |
[22] | Litman, J. A. (2006). The COPE inventory: Dimensionality and relationships with approach- and avoidance-motives and positive and negative traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 273 – 284. |
[23] | Struthers, C. W., Perry, R. P., & Menec, V. H. (2000). An examination of the relationship among academic stress, coping, motivation, and performance in college. Research in Higher Education, 41, 581-592. |
[24] | Brougham, R. R., Zail, C. M., Mendoza, C. M., & Miller, J. R. (2009). Stress, sex differences and coping strategies among college students. Current Psychology, 28, 85 – 97. |
[25] | Eisenbarth, C. (2012). Coping profiles and psychological distress: A cluster analysis. North American Journal of Psychology, 14(3), 485 – 496. |
[26] | Yong, L. M. S. (2003). Norms & technical manual: The Leonard Personality Inventory (LPI). Kuala Lumpur: Leonad Personality Incorporated. |
[27] | Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social psychology of health: Claremont Symposium on applied social psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. |
[28] | Litman, J. A., & Lunsford, G. D. (2009). Frequency of use and impact of coping strategies assessed by the COPE Inventory and their relationships to post-event health and well-being. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 982-991. |
[29] | Cohen, S. , Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385 – 396. |
[30] | Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer. |
[31] | Chao, R. C. (2012). Managing perceived stress among college students: The roles of social support and dysfunctional coping. Journal of College Counseling, 15, 5 – 21. |
APA Style
Ming Sing Chai, Chee Seong Low. (2015). Personality, Coping and Stress Among University Students. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(3-1), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.s.2015040301.16
ACS Style
Ming Sing Chai; Chee Seong Low. Personality, Coping and Stress Among University Students. Am. J. Appl. Psychol. 2015, 4(3-1), 33-38. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.s.2015040301.16
AMA Style
Ming Sing Chai, Chee Seong Low. Personality, Coping and Stress Among University Students. Am J Appl Psychol. 2015;4(3-1):33-38. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.s.2015040301.16
@article{10.11648/j.ajap.s.2015040301.16, author = {Ming Sing Chai and Chee Seong Low}, title = {Personality, Coping and Stress Among University Students}, journal = {American Journal of Applied Psychology}, volume = {4}, number = {3-1}, pages = {33-38}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajap.s.2015040301.16}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.s.2015040301.16}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajap.s.2015040301.16}, abstract = {The study examined the relationship between personality, coping strategies, and level of psychological stress. Participants consisted of 148 university students from a private university college in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Leonard Personality Inventory (LPI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and COPE Inventory were used. The results revealed that participants who have high analytical personality dimension were more likely to use problem-focused coping. Those with high relational and low openness personality dimension were more likely to use socially supported coping strategies. Contrary to expectation, level of psychological stress was not influenced by personality. However, higher level of psychological stress was related to avoidant and socially supported coping strategies. Findings may be beneficial to mental health professionals in helping university students to manage their stress.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Personality, Coping and Stress Among University Students AU - Ming Sing Chai AU - Chee Seong Low Y1 - 2015/03/28 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.s.2015040301.16 DO - 10.11648/j.ajap.s.2015040301.16 T2 - American Journal of Applied Psychology JF - American Journal of Applied Psychology JO - American Journal of Applied Psychology SP - 33 EP - 38 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5672 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.s.2015040301.16 AB - The study examined the relationship between personality, coping strategies, and level of psychological stress. Participants consisted of 148 university students from a private university college in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Leonard Personality Inventory (LPI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and COPE Inventory were used. The results revealed that participants who have high analytical personality dimension were more likely to use problem-focused coping. Those with high relational and low openness personality dimension were more likely to use socially supported coping strategies. Contrary to expectation, level of psychological stress was not influenced by personality. However, higher level of psychological stress was related to avoidant and socially supported coping strategies. Findings may be beneficial to mental health professionals in helping university students to manage their stress. VL - 4 IS - 3-1 ER -