In the present study, four different pigmented rice varieties, namely glutinous white rice, black rice and two red rice varieties (TPS-1 and TKM-9) were evaluated for various quality aspects in terms of milling and physical characteristics such as hulling percentage, milling percentage, whole kernel recovery, milling loss, thousand grain weight, grain volume, bulk density, true density, grain length, grain width and L/B ratio. Among the four rice varieties TPS-1 had the highest hulling percentage, milling percentage, whole kernel recovery percentage. While as, glutinous white rice had the lowest milling loss. Thousand grain weight, grain volume was higher in glutinous white rice variety. Bulk density and true density were found to be highest for glutinous white rice followed by TPS-1, TKM-9 and black rice. Milling characteristic in terms of hulling percentage, milling percentage, whole kernel recovery and milling loss showed significant difference between the varieties. L/B ratio was found to be highest for glutinous white rice followed by TPS-1, TKM-9 and black rice variety. Grain length and grain width observed range from 5.38 – 6.38 mm and 1.90 – 2.24 mm.
Published in | Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences (Volume 5, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jfns.20170506.15 |
Page(s) | 236-241 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Milling Characteristic, Whole kernel Recovery, L/B Ratio, Bulk Density
[1] | Adair, C. R. 1952. The McGill Miller method for determining the milling quality of small samples of rice. Rice Journal. 55 (2): 21. |
[2] | Ali, L. C., Pan, J. and Dan, B. W. 1993. The mineral nutrient component and characteristics of color and white brown rice. Chinese Journal of Rice Science. 7(2): 95-100. |
[3] | Anon. 1996. The wealth of India, Raw Materials. Publication and Information Directorate, CSIR, New Delhi. (7): 164-183. |
[4] | Asamarai, A. M., Addis, P. B., Epley, R. J., and Krick, T. P. 1996. Wild rice hull antioxidants. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 44: 126–130. |
[5] | Bandyopadhyay, S. and Roy, N. C. 1992. Rice Process Technology. Oxford and IBH Publishing co. pvt. ltd. New Delhi. 35-99. |
[6] | CRRI. 1999. Annual report for 1999. Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack. Pp. 40. |
[7] | Cruz Dela, N. and Khush, G. S. 2000. Rice grain quality evaluation procedures. In: Aromatic rices. Singh RK, Singh, US, Khush GS, (Eds). Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India. Pp. 16-28. |
[8] | Elsy, C. R., Roasamma, C. A., and Potty, N. N. 1992. Njavara – a rice variety with special characters. Oryza. 29: 55-56. |
[9] | Ganesan, S. P., Sivasubramaniam., Swaminathan, R and Srinivasan, V. 1998. Grain weight in cultivated strains of paddy, Madras Agricultural Journal. 5: 256-259. |
[10] | Ghosh, A. K., Nanda, B. B., Swami, S. G and Nayak, B. B. 1971. Influence of nitrogen on the physico-chemical characteristics of rice grain. Oryza. 891: 87-97. |
[11] | Ghrist, J. 1965. Influence of nitrogen on the physico-chemical characteristics of rice grain. Oryza. 891: 87-97. |
[12] | Govindaswami, S., Ghosh, A. K., Nanda, B. B. 1969. Varietal differences in hulling and cookingqualities. Annual Report of Central Rice Research Institute India. |
[13] | Gupta, P. K. and Agarwal, R. L. 2000. Determination of varietal purity of paddy varieties by laboratory evaluation. Oryza. 25: 310-314. |
[14] | IRRI International Rice Research Institute. 1980. Annual report for 1980. Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines. Pp 25-38. |
[15] | Kaul, A. K. 1970. Earlier generation testing for quality characters II, Rice. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding. 303: 237-243. |
[16] | Murthy, P. S. N. and Govindaswami, S. 1967. Inheritance of grain size and its correlation with hulling and cooking quality. Oryza. 4: 12–21. |
[17] | Nanda, B. B., Ghose, A. K. andBehera, G. B. 1976. Variability in physico-chemical characteristics of somerice varieties. Riso (Italy). 25 (3): 265–270. |
[18] | Nirmala, B. 1997. Objective and subjective evaluation of foods. Lecture delivered to the participation of ICAR-Summer Course on “Under Food Grains: Quality Assessment, Technology for Use and Popularization”. July 23 to August 1, 1997. College of Rural Home Science, UAS, Dharwad, Karnataka. Pp. 7. |
[19] | Osawa, T., Ramarathnam, N., Kawakishi, S. and Namiki, M. 1992. Antioxidative defense systems generated by phenolic plant constituents. ACS Symposium Series. 507: 122–134. |
[20] | Pandey, J. P. and Gupta, D. K. 2000. Interaction of physical and milling characteristics of paddy. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 37(2): 174-177. |
[21] | Prashant Ghadge, N. and Prasad, K. 2012. Some Physical Properties of Rice Kernels: Variety PR-106. Journal of Food Processing Technology. 3: 8. |
[22] | Ramiah, K. 1993. Rice breeding and Genetics. Science Monograph. No. 19. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, Idia. Pp. 106. |
[23] | Ravindra, V. Shreya, K., Kuldeep Singh Dangi and Nagesh. P. 2009. Evaluation of popular rice (Oryza sativa L.) Hybrids for Quantitative, Qualitative and Nutritional Aspects. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 3 (1): 2250-3153. |
[24] | Reddy, G. S. 2000. Characterization and evaluation of the rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivar Njavara M. Sc (Ag.) Thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur. Pp. 137. |
[25] | Reddy, G. S. 2000. Characterization and evaluation of the rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivar Njavara M. Sc (Ag.) Thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur. Pp. 137. |
[26] | Srivastava, A. K., Jaiswal, H. K. 2013. Grain Characteristics and cooking quality of Indigenous Aromatic and Non-Aromatic Genotypes of Rice (Oryza sativa L.). International Journal of Scientific Research and Reviews. 2(1): 36-41. |
[27] | Thomas Rachel, Wan-Nadiah, W. A. and Rajeev Bhat. 2013. Physiochemical properties, proximate composition, and cooking qualities of locally grown and imported rice varieties marketed in Penang, Malaysia. International Food Research Journal 20(3): 1345-1351. |
APA Style
Saravanan Ponnappan, Arun Thangavel, Omprakash Sahu. (2017). Milling and Physical Characteristics of Pigmented Rice Varieties. Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 5(6), 236-241. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfns.20170506.15
ACS Style
Saravanan Ponnappan; Arun Thangavel; Omprakash Sahu. Milling and Physical Characteristics of Pigmented Rice Varieties. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2017, 5(6), 236-241. doi: 10.11648/j.jfns.20170506.15
AMA Style
Saravanan Ponnappan, Arun Thangavel, Omprakash Sahu. Milling and Physical Characteristics of Pigmented Rice Varieties. J Food Nutr Sci. 2017;5(6):236-241. doi: 10.11648/j.jfns.20170506.15
@article{10.11648/j.jfns.20170506.15, author = {Saravanan Ponnappan and Arun Thangavel and Omprakash Sahu}, title = {Milling and Physical Characteristics of Pigmented Rice Varieties}, journal = {Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences}, volume = {5}, number = {6}, pages = {236-241}, doi = {10.11648/j.jfns.20170506.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfns.20170506.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jfns.20170506.15}, abstract = {In the present study, four different pigmented rice varieties, namely glutinous white rice, black rice and two red rice varieties (TPS-1 and TKM-9) were evaluated for various quality aspects in terms of milling and physical characteristics such as hulling percentage, milling percentage, whole kernel recovery, milling loss, thousand grain weight, grain volume, bulk density, true density, grain length, grain width and L/B ratio. Among the four rice varieties TPS-1 had the highest hulling percentage, milling percentage, whole kernel recovery percentage. While as, glutinous white rice had the lowest milling loss. Thousand grain weight, grain volume was higher in glutinous white rice variety. Bulk density and true density were found to be highest for glutinous white rice followed by TPS-1, TKM-9 and black rice. Milling characteristic in terms of hulling percentage, milling percentage, whole kernel recovery and milling loss showed significant difference between the varieties. L/B ratio was found to be highest for glutinous white rice followed by TPS-1, TKM-9 and black rice variety. Grain length and grain width observed range from 5.38 – 6.38 mm and 1.90 – 2.24 mm.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Milling and Physical Characteristics of Pigmented Rice Varieties AU - Saravanan Ponnappan AU - Arun Thangavel AU - Omprakash Sahu Y1 - 2017/11/30 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfns.20170506.15 DO - 10.11648/j.jfns.20170506.15 T2 - Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences JF - Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences JO - Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences SP - 236 EP - 241 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7293 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfns.20170506.15 AB - In the present study, four different pigmented rice varieties, namely glutinous white rice, black rice and two red rice varieties (TPS-1 and TKM-9) were evaluated for various quality aspects in terms of milling and physical characteristics such as hulling percentage, milling percentage, whole kernel recovery, milling loss, thousand grain weight, grain volume, bulk density, true density, grain length, grain width and L/B ratio. Among the four rice varieties TPS-1 had the highest hulling percentage, milling percentage, whole kernel recovery percentage. While as, glutinous white rice had the lowest milling loss. Thousand grain weight, grain volume was higher in glutinous white rice variety. Bulk density and true density were found to be highest for glutinous white rice followed by TPS-1, TKM-9 and black rice. Milling characteristic in terms of hulling percentage, milling percentage, whole kernel recovery and milling loss showed significant difference between the varieties. L/B ratio was found to be highest for glutinous white rice followed by TPS-1, TKM-9 and black rice variety. Grain length and grain width observed range from 5.38 – 6.38 mm and 1.90 – 2.24 mm. VL - 5 IS - 6 ER -